TY - GEN
T1 - Word error rate estimation without asr output
T2 - 21st Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2020
AU - Ali, Ahmed
AU - Renals, Steve
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 ISCA
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Measuring the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems requires manually transcribed data in order to compute the word error rate (WER), which is often time-consuming and expensive. In this paper, we continue our effort in estimating WER using acoustic, lexical and phonotactic features. Our novel approach to estimate the WER uses a multistream end-to-end architecture. We report results for systems using internal speech decoder features (glass-box), systems without speech decoder features (black-box), and for systems without having access to the ASR system (no-box). The no-box system learns joint acoustic-lexical representation from phoneme recognition results along with MFCC acoustic features to estimate WER. Considering WER per sentence, our no-box system achieves 0.56 Pearson correlation with the reference evaluation and 0.24 root mean square error (RMSE) across 1,400 sentences. The estimated overall WER by e-WER2 is 30.9% for a three hours test set, while the WER computed using the reference transcriptions was 28.5%.
AB - Measuring the performance of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems requires manually transcribed data in order to compute the word error rate (WER), which is often time-consuming and expensive. In this paper, we continue our effort in estimating WER using acoustic, lexical and phonotactic features. Our novel approach to estimate the WER uses a multistream end-to-end architecture. We report results for systems using internal speech decoder features (glass-box), systems without speech decoder features (black-box), and for systems without having access to the ASR system (no-box). The no-box system learns joint acoustic-lexical representation from phoneme recognition results along with MFCC acoustic features to estimate WER. Considering WER per sentence, our no-box system achieves 0.56 Pearson correlation with the reference evaluation and 0.24 root mean square error (RMSE) across 1,400 sentences. The estimated overall WER by e-WER2 is 30.9% for a three hours test set, while the WER computed using the reference transcriptions was 28.5%.
KW - End-to-end
KW - Word error rate estimation. multistream
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85098160915
U2 - 10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2357
DO - 10.21437/Interspeech.2020-2357
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85098160915
SN - 9781713820697
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH
SP - 616
EP - 620
BT - Interspeech 2020
PB - International Speech Communication Association
Y2 - 25 October 2020 through 29 October 2020
ER -