Why Words Matter: The Problem with the Term Islamist

Usaama Al-Azami

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned reportpeer-review

Abstract

The term Islamist has meant different things at different times to different people. Today, when used in English it usually conjures up terrifying images of masked gunmen on the streets of European capitals killing innocent civilians in the name of Islam. Ironically, the term first began to take hold amongst Western academics and policymakers so that they could talk about largely non-violent Islamic activism in the Muslim world without resorting to the derogatory label of “Islamic fundamentalism.” This in turn appears to have influenced democratically-oriented Islamic movements in the Middle East to refer to themselves using the term’s Arabic equivalent: Islamiyyūn. Yet, the word Islamist is used today by media commentators and policymakers alike to describe both democratically oriented political parties like the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) as well as anti-democratic terrorist groups like ISIS.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherSadeq Institute
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 23 Nov 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why Words Matter: The Problem with the Term Islamist'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this