What’s in the box? Exploring UK players’ experiences of loot boxes in games; the conceptualisation and parallels with gambling

  • Sarah E. Hodge*
  • , Max Vykoukal
  • , John McAlaney
  • , Reece D. Bush-Evans
  • , Ruijie Wang
  • , Raian Ali
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Loot boxes are a popular mechanic within many video games, but it remains unclear if some forms of loot boxes can be seen of as gambling. However, the perspectives of players are often neglected, such as whether they see them as ‘fair’ game elements and how closely they feel this aligns with gambling. In this paper, we synthesise a conceptualisation for loot boxes through players’ actual experience and explore if there are any parallels with gambling. Twenty-one participants who played video games took part in the research through either an interview or online survey. Thematic analysis suggested that six themes were core to exploring loot boxes: Random Chance Effects, Attitudes Towards Content, Implementation, Parallels with Gambling, Game Design, and The Player. The results suggested both indirect and direct parallels with gambling from the players experiences. Implications of game design and classifying loot boxes as gambling are discussed in relation to game design and risk factors of gambling and purchasing behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0263567
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume17
Issue number2 February
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What’s in the box? Exploring UK players’ experiences of loot boxes in games; the conceptualisation and parallels with gambling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this