TY - JOUR
T1 - The sustainability of partial and total replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement
T2 - A deep dive into different concrete mixtures through life cycle assessment
AU - Sbahieh, Sami
AU - McKay, Gordon
AU - Nurdiawati, Anissa
AU - Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/8/15
Y1 - 2025/8/15
N2 - The construction sector significantly impacts environmental sustainability, with cement production being a major source of carbon emissions. Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) manufacturing is highly energy-intensive due to limestone calcination and fossil fuel consumption. To mitigate these environmental effects, this study evaluates the sustainability of literature based alternative concrete mixtures through a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), considering both partial and total cement replacement strategies. The study examines OPC blended with Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) such as fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), as well as geopolymer concrete as a complete substitute for OPC. Findings indicate that SCMs significantly reduce the environmental footprint of OPC concrete, with GGBS-blended OPC achieving the highest CO2 reduction (28.7 %), followed by SF (28.3 %), FA (17.25 %), and MK (15.1 %). Geopolymer concrete demonstrated an even greater CO2 reduction, with FA-based and GGBS-based geopolymers reducing emissions by 67 % and 54 %, respectively. However, geopolymers showed higher environmental impacts in categories such as fossil depletion, human toxicity, and ozone depletion, mainly due to the production of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide. Notably, MK-based geopolymer concrete exhibited the highest overall environmental burden, performing worse than OPC concrete in all impact categories. The results highlight that the optimal choice of concrete depends on specific environmental goals. SCM-blended OPC presents a feasible and effective solution for lowering CO2 emissions, while geopolymer concrete offers a more sustainable alternative if challenges related to chemical activators are addressed. This study underscores the importance of optimizing raw material sourcing, production processes, and transportation logistics to enhance the sustainability of concrete in real-world applications.
AB - The construction sector significantly impacts environmental sustainability, with cement production being a major source of carbon emissions. Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) manufacturing is highly energy-intensive due to limestone calcination and fossil fuel consumption. To mitigate these environmental effects, this study evaluates the sustainability of literature based alternative concrete mixtures through a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), considering both partial and total cement replacement strategies. The study examines OPC blended with Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) such as fly ash (FA), silica fume (SF), metakaolin (MK), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), as well as geopolymer concrete as a complete substitute for OPC. Findings indicate that SCMs significantly reduce the environmental footprint of OPC concrete, with GGBS-blended OPC achieving the highest CO2 reduction (28.7 %), followed by SF (28.3 %), FA (17.25 %), and MK (15.1 %). Geopolymer concrete demonstrated an even greater CO2 reduction, with FA-based and GGBS-based geopolymers reducing emissions by 67 % and 54 %, respectively. However, geopolymers showed higher environmental impacts in categories such as fossil depletion, human toxicity, and ozone depletion, mainly due to the production of sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide. Notably, MK-based geopolymer concrete exhibited the highest overall environmental burden, performing worse than OPC concrete in all impact categories. The results highlight that the optimal choice of concrete depends on specific environmental goals. SCM-blended OPC presents a feasible and effective solution for lowering CO2 emissions, while geopolymer concrete offers a more sustainable alternative if challenges related to chemical activators are addressed. This study underscores the importance of optimizing raw material sourcing, production processes, and transportation logistics to enhance the sustainability of concrete in real-world applications.
KW - Concrete production
KW - Geopolymer concrete
KW - Life-cycle assessment (LCA)
KW - Supplementary cementitious materials
KW - Sustainable concrete
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105004874140
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112830
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112830
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105004874140
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 108
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
M1 - 112830
ER -