TY - GEN
T1 - The impact of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) on physicians
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Muhiyaddin, Raghad
AU - Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa A.
AU - Househ, Mowafa
AU - Alam, Tanvir
AU - Shah, Zubair
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The authors and IOS Press.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) are used in a clinical setting to help physicians make decisions to improve clinical performance and patient care. There are many benefits to the implementation and adoption of CDSSs, such as reducing the rate of misdiagnosis, improving efficiency and patient care, and reducing the risk of medication errors. On the other hand, CDSSs can have several disadvantages. For example, physicians can see CDSSs as a threat to their clinical autonomy. CDSSs can also be very costly to adopt, maintain, and support. These advantages and disadvantages can have both positive and negative impacts on physicians. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of CDSSs on physicians. We searched the following electronic databases: CINAHL, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently selected the retrieved studies and extracted data from the included studies. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the extracted data. We included 14 studies of the 300 retrieved studies. We identified the following positive impacts: Work efficiency, providing more personalized care, improving care and knowledge, increasing confidence in making decisions, improving prescribing behavior, and reducing the number of ordered laboratory and medical imaging tests. Several negative impacts were also reported by the studies, namely: Inefficient documentation, interruption in the patient-physician communication, and an increase in unnecessary referrals.
AB - Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) are used in a clinical setting to help physicians make decisions to improve clinical performance and patient care. There are many benefits to the implementation and adoption of CDSSs, such as reducing the rate of misdiagnosis, improving efficiency and patient care, and reducing the risk of medication errors. On the other hand, CDSSs can have several disadvantages. For example, physicians can see CDSSs as a threat to their clinical autonomy. CDSSs can also be very costly to adopt, maintain, and support. These advantages and disadvantages can have both positive and negative impacts on physicians. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of CDSSs on physicians. We searched the following electronic databases: CINAHL, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently selected the retrieved studies and extracted data from the included studies. A narrative approach was used to synthesize the extracted data. We included 14 studies of the 300 retrieved studies. We identified the following positive impacts: Work efficiency, providing more personalized care, improving care and knowledge, increasing confidence in making decisions, improving prescribing behavior, and reducing the number of ordered laboratory and medical imaging tests. Several negative impacts were also reported by the studies, namely: Inefficient documentation, interruption in the patient-physician communication, and an increase in unnecessary referrals.
KW - Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)
KW - impact
KW - physicians
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087402886
U2 - 10.3233/SHTI200597
DO - 10.3233/SHTI200597
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 32604704
AN - SCOPUS:85087402886
T3 - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
SP - 470
EP - 473
BT - THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH INFORMATICS IN PUBLIC HEALTH DURING A PANDEMIC
A2 - Mantas, John
A2 - Hasman, Arie
A2 - Househ, Mowafa S.
A2 - Gallos, Parisis
A2 - Zoulias, Emmanouil
PB - IOS Press
ER -