The Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing: Continuing the Conversation

  • Nancy S. Jecker*
  • , Caesar Atuire
  • , Vardit Ravitsky
  • , Mohammad Ghaly
  • , Jean Christophe Bélisle-Pipon
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our article, “Proposed Principles for International Bioethics Conferencing: Anti-Discriminatory, Global, and Inclusive,” urged a critical conversation with bioethicists around the globe on the ethics of international bioethics conferencing (Jecker et al. Citation2024). Focusing on site selection, we tentatively set forth seven principles: anti-discriminatory, international, green, fair-minded, leave no one behind, free exchange of ideas, and epistemic justice. We appreciate the vigorous response our proposal generated, and the overall recognition of the ethical importance of the topic. We are grateful to Van Der Graaf and colleagues, who were the first in the literature to pinpoint the need for sustained debate within bioethics on the ethics of ethics conferencing (Van Der Graaf et al. Citation2023). We cannot do justice to all points colleagues raised across 15 separate commentaries. In this short response, we focus on objections and proposed addenda to the seven principles.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)W1-W7
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Mar 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Ethics of International Bioethics Conferencing: Continuing the Conversation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this