Targeted Inactivation of Bax Reveals a Subtype-Specific Mechanism of Cajal-Retzius Neuron Death in the Postnatal Cerebral Cortex

Fanny Ledonne, David Orduz, Judith Mercier, Lisa Vigier, Elisabeth A. Grove, Fadel Tissir, Maria Cecilia Angulo, Alessandra Pierani*, Eva Coppola

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cajal-Retzius cells (CRs), the first-born neurons in the developing cerebral cortex, coordinate crucial steps in the construction of functional circuits. CRs are thought to be transient, as they disappear during early postnatal life in both mice and humans, where their abnormal persistence is associated with pathological conditions. Embryonic CRs comprise at least three molecularly and functionally distinct subtypes: septum, ventral pallium/pallial-subpallial boundary (PSB), and hem. However, whether subtype-specific features exist postnatally and through which mechanisms they disappear remain unknown. We report that CR subtypes display unique distributions and dynamics of death in the postnatal mouse cortex. Surprisingly, although all CR subtypes undergo cell death, septum, but not hem, CRs die in a Bax-dependent manner. Bax-inactivated rescued septum-CRs maintain immature electrophysiological properties. These results underlie the existence of an exquisitely refined control of developmental cell death and provide a model to test the effect of maintaining immature circuits in the adult neocortex.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3133-3141
Number of pages9
JournalCell Reports
Volume17
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bax
  • Cajal-Retzius cells
  • death
  • distribution
  • immature circuits
  • postnatal cerebral cortex
  • transient neurons

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Targeted Inactivation of Bax Reveals a Subtype-Specific Mechanism of Cajal-Retzius Neuron Death in the Postnatal Cerebral Cortex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this