TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategic site selection for biohydrogen production
T2 - Enhancing rural sustainability through agricultural biomass
AU - Seyhan, Mehmet
AU - Tanürün, Himmet Erdi
AU - Aydin, Nezir
AU - Ayyildiz, Ertugrul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 International Energy Initiative
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - This study develops a systematic multi-criteria decision-making framework to identify optimal sites for biomass-based hydrogen production facilities, emphasizing sustainability and rural development in developing countries. We introduce a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach that integrates the Best–Worst Method (BWM) for criteria weighting with Pythagorean Fuzzy COmbinative Distance-based ASsessment (PF-CODAS) for alternative ranking, enabling robust evaluation under uncertainty. The criteria are structured as a five-pillar framework consisting of economic market factors, environmental sustainability, resource utilization, process efficiency, and safety considerations, operationalized via 29 sub-criteria and informed by seven domain experts. Applying this approach in Türkiye, five rural locations (Konya, Adana, Balıkesir, Şanlıurfa, Samsun) were assessed, using agricultural residues as the primary feedstock context. Konya ranked first and Adana second, reflecting strong logistics and market conditions and biomass availability alongside environmental performance. BWM results highlight GHG Emission Reduction as the highest weighted sub-criterion with Water Resource Utilization, and within process efficiency, Thermal Optimization is also prominent. A sensitivity analysis showed stable rankings for the top alternative, and comparative benchmarking against two well-known methods yielded consistent top two results, underscoring methodological robustness. This study highlights the significant potential of strategically located biomass-to‑hydrogen facilities to improve rural livelihoods, support local economies, and contribute to global sustainability goals by offering a viable alternative to traditional biomass use.
AB - This study develops a systematic multi-criteria decision-making framework to identify optimal sites for biomass-based hydrogen production facilities, emphasizing sustainability and rural development in developing countries. We introduce a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach that integrates the Best–Worst Method (BWM) for criteria weighting with Pythagorean Fuzzy COmbinative Distance-based ASsessment (PF-CODAS) for alternative ranking, enabling robust evaluation under uncertainty. The criteria are structured as a five-pillar framework consisting of economic market factors, environmental sustainability, resource utilization, process efficiency, and safety considerations, operationalized via 29 sub-criteria and informed by seven domain experts. Applying this approach in Türkiye, five rural locations (Konya, Adana, Balıkesir, Şanlıurfa, Samsun) were assessed, using agricultural residues as the primary feedstock context. Konya ranked first and Adana second, reflecting strong logistics and market conditions and biomass availability alongside environmental performance. BWM results highlight GHG Emission Reduction as the highest weighted sub-criterion with Water Resource Utilization, and within process efficiency, Thermal Optimization is also prominent. A sensitivity analysis showed stable rankings for the top alternative, and comparative benchmarking against two well-known methods yielded consistent top two results, underscoring methodological robustness. This study highlights the significant potential of strategically located biomass-to‑hydrogen facilities to improve rural livelihoods, support local economies, and contribute to global sustainability goals by offering a viable alternative to traditional biomass use.
KW - Agricultural residues
KW - Best-worst method
KW - Biohydrogen
KW - Multi-criteria decision making
KW - Rural development
KW - Site selection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016785275
U2 - 10.1016/j.esd.2025.101838
DO - 10.1016/j.esd.2025.101838
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105016785275
SN - 0973-0826
VL - 89
JO - Energy for Sustainable Development
JF - Energy for Sustainable Development
M1 - 101838
ER -