Abstract
Despite widespread enthusiasm for digital technologies as pathways to empowerment, critical scholarship shows that innovation alone cannot dismantle entrenched inequities. This article synthesises intersectional feminist and postcolonial critiques of “tech solutionism” through India’s Aadhaar biometric system and Kenya’s M-Pesa mobile money platform, arguing that mechanisms promising efficiency simultaneously reproduce gendered, racialised, and classed exclusions. Through critical narrative synthesis of 211 sources, I advance a proposed framework operationalising participatory co-design, reflexive implementation with privacy safeguards, and equity-oriented evaluation. This conceptual contribution reimagines digital development as collaborative and justice-oriented rather than techno-optimistic, offering a heuristic tool requiring empirical validation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Development in Practice |
| Early online date | Jun 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Jun 2026 |
Keywords
- Algorithmic governance
- Data colonialism
- Digital development
- Intersectional feminism
- Postcolonial critique
- Tech solutionism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reimagining digital development: an intersectional feminist critique of “tech solutionism” in India and Kenya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver