Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regulating LawTech for Dispute Settlement in the Digital Economy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

The chapter discusses the evolution of justice and dispute resolution in the era of LawTech (LT). Traditional taxonomies of justice are mirrored in new forms of digital dispute settlement (DDS), where the idealized Justice Hercules is compared to the prospect of robo-judges. Currently, LT primarily supports traditional courts as they transition to e-courts. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is evolving into online dispute resolution (ODR), with blockchain-based crowdsourcing emerging as a potential alternative to traditional justice. Hybrid models of dispute resolution are also taking shape. The chapter outlines assessment criteria for adopting LT in digital systems, focusing on ensuring that DS in the digital economy remains independent, impartial, and enforceable. Human centricity is core construct for the co-development of LT and DS. This overarching principle requires human oversight, transparency, data privacy, and fairness in both access and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of the Governance of Technology
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter14
Pages241 - 262
Number of pages22
ISBN (Print)9781009522519
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating LawTech for Dispute Settlement in the Digital Economy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this