Receipt of Written Communications

Ilias Bantekas

doi:10.1017/9781108633376.005

Receipt of Written Communications

Ilias Bantekas^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

HBKU College of Law

School of Advanced Study

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

Footnote 36 in the same document explained that the brackets were meant in case the provision was declared mandatory and/or where service was required to be made by the tribunal and not the parties. So, the delicate matter of the sender had not been decided early on in the discussions. During the same time, discussions concerning other provisions entailing an element of notification focused very little, if at all, on setting out a general rule as to proof of receipt.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Subtitle of host publication	A Commentary
Publisher	Cambridge University Press
Pages	50-70
Number of pages	21
ISBN (Electronic)	9781108633376
ISBN (Print)	9781108498234
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108633376.005
Publication status	Published - 18 Feb 2020

Access to Document

10.1017/9781108633376.005

Cite this

@inbook{74132da36bc543b1ade3cff6717954ed,

title = "Receipt of Written Communications",

abstract = "Footnote 36 in the same document explained that the brackets were meant in case the provision was declared mandatory and/or where service was required to be made by the tribunal and not the parties. So, the delicate matter of the sender had not been decided early on in the discussions. During the same time, discussions concerning other provisions entailing an element of notification focused very little, if at all, on setting out a general rule as to proof of receipt.",

author = "Ilias Bantekas",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Ilias Bantekas, Pietro Ortolani, Shahla Ali, Manuel G{\'o}mez and Michael Polkinghorne 2020.",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1017/9781108633376.005",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781108498234",

pages = "50--70",

booktitle = "Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Receipt of Written Communications

AU - Bantekas, Ilias

PY - 2020/2/18

Y1 - 2020/2/18

N2 - Footnote 36 in the same document explained that the brackets were meant in case the provision was declared mandatory and/or where service was required to be made by the tribunal and not the parties. So, the delicate matter of the sender had not been decided early on in the discussions. During the same time, discussions concerning other provisions entailing an element of notification focused very little, if at all, on setting out a general rule as to proof of receipt.

AB - Footnote 36 in the same document explained that the brackets were meant in case the provision was declared mandatory and/or where service was required to be made by the tribunal and not the parties. So, the delicate matter of the sender had not been decided early on in the discussions. During the same time, discussions concerning other provisions entailing an element of notification focused very little, if at all, on setting out a general rule as to proof of receipt.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85192874782

U2 - 10.1017/9781108633376.005

DO - 10.1017/9781108633376.005

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85192874782

SN - 9781108498234

SP - 50

EP - 70

BT - Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Receipt of Written Communications

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this