Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rational vs. irrational beliefs in a complex world

  • Gregor Boehl
  • , Cars Hommes*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Bonn
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

How do rational and boundedly rational agents interact in a competitive asset market? To answer this question, we build a highly nonlinear asset pricing model where agents hold heterogeneous beliefs. Our model features fully rational forward looking agents versus boundedly rational backward looking agents whose market shares evolve endogenously. This gives rise to chaotic model dynamics which are characterized by complex bubble and crash dynamics, even without any exogenous fluctuations. We show that computational methods can be applied to numerically analyze models combining agents forming rational expectations and agents forming extrapolative expectations, with the possibility of transition between one type of behavior and the other. Not only do we find that boundedly rational agents remain in the market, but document that their effect on price dynamics is even amplified by the behavior of fully rational agents. In their interaction, trend-extrapolators amplify small deviations from fundamentals, while rational agents eventually anticipate market crashes after large bubbles and drive prices back to the fundamental.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106898
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume232
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Behavioral interaction
  • Bubbles
  • Heterogeneous agents
  • Numerical methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rational vs. irrational beliefs in a complex world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this