TY - GEN
T1 - Radio Frequency Fingerprinting
T2 - 21st IEEE International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2025
AU - Irfan, Muhammad
AU - Al-Malki, Maryam
AU - Sciancalepore, Savio
AU - Oligeri, Gabriele
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Radio Frequency fingerprinting (RFF) is emerging as a viable alternative to authenticating radio devices, serving as a mitigation technique for spoofing and impersonation attacks on the wireless channel. RFF relies on the observation that each radio transducer features a distinctive radio fingerprint that is impractical - or even impossible - to forge by any other device.In this work, we provide an in-depth analysis of current state-of-the-art RFF approaches by comparing deep learning techniques and the associated methodologies. We consider real measurements in a controlled scenario and compare different configurations and classifiers in terms of performance and training time. Our findings show that the performance of the 11 considered classifiers is significantly biased by the methodology considered during the selection of the data for the training and testing datasets. Training and testing on different measurements or when radios are power-cycled significantly affects the accuracy of the classifier. Overall, our investigation sheds light on best practices and configurations to be considered to maximize the performance of RFF systems deployed in the wild.
AB - Radio Frequency fingerprinting (RFF) is emerging as a viable alternative to authenticating radio devices, serving as a mitigation technique for spoofing and impersonation attacks on the wireless channel. RFF relies on the observation that each radio transducer features a distinctive radio fingerprint that is impractical - or even impossible - to forge by any other device.In this work, we provide an in-depth analysis of current state-of-the-art RFF approaches by comparing deep learning techniques and the associated methodologies. We consider real measurements in a controlled scenario and compare different configurations and classifiers in terms of performance and training time. Our findings show that the performance of the 11 considered classifiers is significantly biased by the methodology considered during the selection of the data for the training and testing datasets. Training and testing on different measurements or when radios are power-cycled significantly affects the accuracy of the classifier. Overall, our investigation sheds light on best practices and configurations to be considered to maximize the performance of RFF systems deployed in the wild.
KW - Convoluation Neural Netwrok
KW - Device authentication
KW - Physical-Layer Security
KW - Wireless Security
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011349036
U2 - 10.1109/IWCMC65282.2025.11059537
DO - 10.1109/IWCMC65282.2025.11059537
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105011349036
T3 - 21st International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2025
SP - 61
EP - 66
BT - 21st International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference, IWCMC 2025
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 12 May 2024 through 16 May 2024
ER -