Quantitative assessment of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: Applied load versus applied displacement

The Salford static knee instrument (SSKI) was developed to determine the quantitative assessment of the human knee joint in vivo by utilizing the technique of applied displacement and measurement of resistive load as proposed by Butler et al. (1). The instrument was used in parallel with the device developed by Al-Turaiki (2) which utilized the opposite method of assessment. The objective of the research was to examine which of the two techniques provided the more reliable and accurate method of knee assessment. Fourteen patients with suspected isolated rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were subjected to anterior-posterior drawer testing on both devices. The results showed that each instrument produced results which confirmed the clinical diagnosis by indicating a significant decrease in anterior stiffness when comparing the injured and uninjured knees. [SSKI device (p = 0.000) and Al-Turaiki (2) device (p = 0.002) statistical significant difference testing with Bonferonni Alpha correction/; = 0.0125]. The results showed the Salford static knee instrument indicated a 58 per cent decrease in anterior stiffness and the Al-Turaiki (2) device a 35 per cent decrease when comparing the injured and uninjured knees. In conclusion it is suggested that the application of displacement and measurement of load as proposed by Butler et al. ( l ) may be the most appropriate technique for precise clinical diagnosis of pathological human knee joint instability.