Path dependencies of nudging, and how to overcome them

Georgios Dimitropoulos

Path dependencies of nudging, and how to overcome them

Georgios Dimitropoulos

Max Planck Institute for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

In a thought-provoking comment on the legitimacy of nudging, Towfigh and Traxlerrightly point out that nudges have many facets. As a result, their legitimacy has tobe judged case by case. Responding partly to Towfigh and Traxler and partly to thebroader issue of the legitimacy of nudging, I want to distinguish between two aspectsthat are raised in the comment: firstly, public and legal legitimacy and secondly,legitimacy among legal professionals

Original language	English
Journal	Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional
Publication status	Published - 17 Apr 2015
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=ah9h-ZoAAAAJ&pagesize=100&citation_for_view=ah9h-ZoAAAAJ:roLk4NBRz8UC

Cite this

@article{05cc23146c43456ca7ea897abe8e5681,

title = "Path dependencies of nudging, and how to overcome them",

abstract = "In a thought-provoking comment on the legitimacy of nudging, Towfigh and Traxlerrightly point out that nudges have many facets. As a result, their legitimacy has tobe judged case by case. Responding partly to Towfigh and Traxler and partly to thebroader issue of the legitimacy of nudging, I want to distinguish between two aspectsthat are raised in the comment: firstly, public and legal legitimacy and secondly,legitimacy among legal professionals",

author = "Georgios Dimitropoulos",

year = "2015",

month = apr,

day = "17",

language = "English",

journal = "Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Path dependencies of nudging, and how to overcome them

AU - Dimitropoulos, Georgios

PY - 2015/4/17

Y1 - 2015/4/17

N2 - In a thought-provoking comment on the legitimacy of nudging, Towfigh and Traxlerrightly point out that nudges have many facets. As a result, their legitimacy has tobe judged case by case. Responding partly to Towfigh and Traxler and partly to thebroader issue of the legitimacy of nudging, I want to distinguish between two aspectsthat are raised in the comment: firstly, public and legal legitimacy and secondly,legitimacy among legal professionals

AB - In a thought-provoking comment on the legitimacy of nudging, Towfigh and Traxlerrightly point out that nudges have many facets. As a result, their legitimacy has tobe judged case by case. Responding partly to Towfigh and Traxler and partly to thebroader issue of the legitimacy of nudging, I want to distinguish between two aspectsthat are raised in the comment: firstly, public and legal legitimacy and secondly,legitimacy among legal professionals

M3 - Comment/debate

JO - Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional

JF - Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional

ER -

Path dependencies of nudging, and how to overcome them

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this