Online Hate Interpretation Varies by Country, but More by Individual: A Statistical Analysis Using Crowdsourced Ratings

Hate is prevalent in online social media. This has resulted in a considerable amount of research in detecting and scoring it. Most computational efforts involve machine learning with crowdsourced ratings as training data. A prominent example of this is the Perspective API., a tool by Google to score toxicity of online comments. However., a major issue in the existing approaches is the lack of consideration for the subjective nature of online hate. While there is research that shows the intensity of hate varies and the hate depends on the context., there is no research that systematically investigates how hate interpretation varies by country or individual. In this exploratory research, we undertake this challenge. We sample crowd workers from 50 countries, have them score the same social media comments for toxicity and then evaluate the differences in the scores., altogether 18.,125 ratings. We find that the interpretation score differences among countries are highly significant. However., the hate interpretations vary more by the individual raters than by countries. These findings suggest that hate scoring systems should consider user-level features when scoring and automating the processing of online hate.