Abstract
In this introduction, we introduce the concept of methodological Americanism to describe and explain the epistemological problem plaguing the public administration discipline. We argue that the discipline, dominated by US-focused analyses, is methodologically nationalist and White and represents a hegemonic intellectualism that limits what is “knowable.” To ensure continual disciplinary relevance of public administration studies, we propose that epistemological diversity—achievable by reshaping the disciplinary table—is the way forward. We conclude by summarizing how the articles in this first of two Special Issues contribute to paving the way toward epistemological diversity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 261-276 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Administrative Theory and Praxis |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Methodological Americanism
- Methodological Nationalism
- Methodological Whiteness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Americanism: Disciplinary senility and intellectual hegemonies in (American) public administration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver