Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen and ammonia production options: A comparative evaluation

  • Yusuf Bicer*
  • , Ibrahim Dincer
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, nuclear energy based hydrogen and ammonia production options ranging from thermochemical cycles to high-temperature electrolysis are comparatively evaluated by means of the life cycle assessment (LCA) tool. Ammonia is produced by extracting nitrogen from air and hydrogen from water and reacting them through nuclear energy. Since production of ammonia contributes about 1% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, new methods with reduced environmental impacts are under close investigation. The selected ammonia production systems are (i) three step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (ii) four step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (iii) five step nuclear Cu–Cl thermochemical cycle, (iv) nuclear energy based electrolysis, and (v) nuclear high temperature electrolysis. The electrolysis units for hydrogen production and a Haber–Bosch process for ammonia synthesis are utilized for the electrolysis-based options while hydrogen is produced thermochemically by means of the process heat available from the nuclear power plants for thermochemical based hydrogen production systems. The LCA results for the selected ammonia production methods show that the nuclear electrolysis based ammonia production method yields lower global warming and climate change impacts while the thermochemical based options yield higher abiotic depletion and acidification values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21559-21570
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume42
Issue number33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ammonia production
  • Environmental impact
  • Hydrogen
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Nuclear

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Life cycle assessment of nuclear-based hydrogen and ammonia production options: A comparative evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this