TY - JOUR
T1 - Intra-Tumor Genetic Heterogeneity in Wilms Tumor
T2 - Clonal Evolution and Clinical Implications
AU - Cresswell, George D.
AU - Apps, John R.
AU - Chagtai, Tasnim
AU - Mifsud, Borbala
AU - Bentley, Christopher C.
AU - Maschietto, Mariana
AU - Popov, Sergey D.
AU - Weeks, Mark E.
AU - Olsen, Øystein E.
AU - Sebire, Neil J.
AU - Pritchard-Jones, Kathy
AU - Luscombe, Nicholas M.
AU - Williams, Richard D.
AU - Mifsud, William
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Authors
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The evolution of pediatric solid tumors is poorly understood. There is conflicting evidence of intra-tumor genetic homogeneity vs. heterogeneity (ITGH) in a small number of studies in pediatric solid tumors. A number of copy number aberrations (CNA) are proposed as prognostic biomarkers to stratify patients, for example 1q + in Wilms tumor (WT); current clinical trials use only one sample per tumor to profile this genetic biomarker. We multisampled 20 WT cases and assessed genome-wide allele-specific CNA and loss of heterozygosity, and inferred tumor evolution, using Illumina CytoSNP12v2.1 arrays, a custom analysis pipeline, and the MEDICC algorithm. We found remarkable diversity of ITGH and evolutionary trajectories in WT. 1q + is heterogeneous in the majority of tumors with this change, with variable evolutionary timing. We estimate that at least three samples per tumor are needed to detect > 95% of cases with 1q +. In contrast, somatic 11p15 LOH is uniformly an early event in WT development. We find evidence of two separate tumor origins in unilateral disease with divergent histology, and in bilateral WT. We also show subclonal changes related to differential response to chemotherapy. Rational trial design to include biomarkers in risk stratification requires tumor multisampling and reliable delineation of ITGH and tumor evolution.
AB - The evolution of pediatric solid tumors is poorly understood. There is conflicting evidence of intra-tumor genetic homogeneity vs. heterogeneity (ITGH) in a small number of studies in pediatric solid tumors. A number of copy number aberrations (CNA) are proposed as prognostic biomarkers to stratify patients, for example 1q + in Wilms tumor (WT); current clinical trials use only one sample per tumor to profile this genetic biomarker. We multisampled 20 WT cases and assessed genome-wide allele-specific CNA and loss of heterozygosity, and inferred tumor evolution, using Illumina CytoSNP12v2.1 arrays, a custom analysis pipeline, and the MEDICC algorithm. We found remarkable diversity of ITGH and evolutionary trajectories in WT. 1q + is heterogeneous in the majority of tumors with this change, with variable evolutionary timing. We estimate that at least three samples per tumor are needed to detect > 95% of cases with 1q +. In contrast, somatic 11p15 LOH is uniformly an early event in WT development. We find evidence of two separate tumor origins in unilateral disease with divergent histology, and in bilateral WT. We also show subclonal changes related to differential response to chemotherapy. Rational trial design to include biomarkers in risk stratification requires tumor multisampling and reliable delineation of ITGH and tumor evolution.
KW - Copy number aberrations
KW - Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity
KW - Molecular biomarkers
KW - Pediatric solid tumors
KW - Tumor evolution
KW - Tumor multisampling
KW - Wilms tumor
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84991650679
U2 - 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.05.029
DO - 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.05.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 27333041
AN - SCOPUS:84991650679
SN - 2352-3964
VL - 9
SP - 120
EP - 129
JO - eBioMedicine
JF - eBioMedicine
ER -