Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Internationale Humanitare Hilfsorganisation v. Germany. Judgment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

On October 10, 2023, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) issued a judgment upholding the decision of the German authorities to suspend the organization International Humanitarian Aid Association (Hilfsorganisation) because of “knowingly support[ing] international terrorism, directly or indirectly” (para. 102). Germany had shut down Hilfsorganisation, proscribing it and ordering confiscation of its assets, on the grounds that one of the entities it funded was the Gaza-based “Islamic Society” (Salam), which was allegedly affiliated with Hamas (para. 9). According to Germany, this presumed indirect funding of Hamas violated the principle of “international understanding between peoples” (Völkerverständigung) (para. 1), which is entrenched in the German Constitution,Footnote 1 and also reflected in the German Associations Act.Footnote 2 According to the Federal Constitutional Court, an association “meets the requirements for a prohibition … when it actively advocates and promotes violence or similarly serious actions violating international law, such as terrorism in international relations or among parts of the population,” and this may also be the case “when an association supports third parties ….”Footnote 3
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)564-572
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of International Law
Volume119
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internationale Humanitare Hilfsorganisation v. Germany. Judgment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this