International scope of biomedical research ethics review

Mark A. Rothstein, Kelly Carty Zimmerer, Pamela Andanda, Thalia Arawi, Fabiana Arzuaga, Haidan Chen, Martine de Vries, Edward S. Dove, Mohammed Ghaly, Ryoko Hatanaka, Aart C. Hendriks, Mireya Castañeda Hernández, Calvin W.L. Ho, Yann Joly, Dorota Krekora-Zając, Won Bok Lee, Titti Mattsson, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor, Kakai Namalwa, Pilar NicolásJane Nielsen, Obiajulu Nnamuchi, Margaret Otlowski, Nicole Palmour, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Gil Siegal, Jane M. Wathuta, Ma’n H. Zawati, Bartha Maria Knoppers

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of biomedical research involving human subjects, the review of research proposals by ethics committees in virtually every country has traditionally focused on informed consent and other protections for individuals participating in research (1). However, the substantial societal implications of modern biomedical research and the globalization of scientific inquiry make it important to understand whether research ethics review in each country addresses both individual and societal issues. Knowledge of the practices internationally can promote understanding and can suggest possible innovations for specific countries. Below, we explore three related issues: (i) whether biomedical research ethics review considers the societal and long-term implications of the research, (ii) whether bodies charged with performing research ethics reviews are appropriate to consider these issues, and (iii) the feasibility and likely support for embedding multidisciplinary researchers with scientists to study societal and long-term implications. We address current regulatory policies and offer comments about possible changes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-147
Number of pages3
JournalScience
Volume385
Issue number6705
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International scope of biomedical research ethics review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this