TY - JOUR
T1 - International scope of biomedical research ethics review
AU - Rothstein, Mark A.
AU - Zimmerer, Kelly Carty
AU - Andanda, Pamela
AU - Arawi, Thalia
AU - Arzuaga, Fabiana
AU - Chen, Haidan
AU - de Vries, Martine
AU - Dove, Edward S.
AU - Ghaly, Mohammed
AU - Hatanaka, Ryoko
AU - Hendriks, Aart C.
AU - Hernández, Mireya Castañeda
AU - Ho, Calvin W.L.
AU - Joly, Yann
AU - Krekora-Zając, Dorota
AU - Lee, Won Bok
AU - Mattsson, Titti
AU - Molnár-Gábor, Fruzsina
AU - Namalwa, Kakai
AU - Nicolás, Pilar
AU - Nielsen, Jane
AU - Nnamuchi, Obiajulu
AU - Otlowski, Margaret
AU - Palmour, Nicole
AU - Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle
AU - Siegal, Gil
AU - Wathuta, Jane M.
AU - Zawati, Ma’n H.
AU - Knoppers, Bartha Maria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/7/12
Y1 - 2024/7/12
N2 - In the context of biomedical research involving human subjects, the review of research proposals by ethics committees in virtually every country has traditionally focused on informed consent and other protections for individuals participating in research (1). However, the substantial societal implications of modern biomedical research and the globalization of scientific inquiry make it important to understand whether research ethics review in each country addresses both individual and societal issues. Knowledge of the practices internationally can promote understanding and can suggest possible innovations for specific countries. Below, we explore three related issues: (i) whether biomedical research ethics review considers the societal and long-term implications of the research, (ii) whether bodies charged with performing research ethics reviews are appropriate to consider these issues, and (iii) the feasibility and likely support for embedding multidisciplinary researchers with scientists to study societal and long-term implications. We address current regulatory policies and offer comments about possible changes.
AB - In the context of biomedical research involving human subjects, the review of research proposals by ethics committees in virtually every country has traditionally focused on informed consent and other protections for individuals participating in research (1). However, the substantial societal implications of modern biomedical research and the globalization of scientific inquiry make it important to understand whether research ethics review in each country addresses both individual and societal issues. Knowledge of the practices internationally can promote understanding and can suggest possible innovations for specific countries. Below, we explore three related issues: (i) whether biomedical research ethics review considers the societal and long-term implications of the research, (ii) whether bodies charged with performing research ethics reviews are appropriate to consider these issues, and (iii) the feasibility and likely support for embedding multidisciplinary researchers with scientists to study societal and long-term implications. We address current regulatory policies and offer comments about possible changes.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85198582035
U2 - 10.1126/science.adp6277
DO - 10.1126/science.adp6277
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38991077
AN - SCOPUS:85198582035
SN - 0036-8075
VL - 385
SP - 145
EP - 147
JO - Science
JF - Science
IS - 6705
ER -