TY - BOOK
T1 - International Law Association Committee on Participation in Global Cultural Heritage Governance
AU - Jakubowski, Andrzej
AU - Lixinski, Lucas
AU - Adlercreutz, Thomas
AU - Bangert, Kaare
AU - Blake, Janet
AU - Chammas, Aïda Tamer
AU - Bories, Clémentine
AU - They, Marine
AU - Calboli, Irene
AU - Céspedes, Rodrigo Carlos
AU - Chainoglou, Kalliopi
AU - Chamberlain, Kevin John
AU - Conlan, Patricia
AU - Strecker, Amy
AU - Volatron, Marie Cornu
AU - Davies, Piers
AU - Clippele, Marie Sophie de
AU - Donders, Yvonne
AU - Campfens, Evelien
AU - Forrest, Craig
AU - Augustinos, Nicholas
AU - Filho, Marcílio Toscano Franca
AU - Frigo, Manlio
AU - Martínez, Sebastián Axel Green
AU - Hausler, Kristin
AU - Kono, Toshiyuki
AU - Sato, Yoshiaki
AU - Lee, Gyooho
AU - Lostal, Marina
AU - Bastos, Fernando Loureiro
AU - Majeed, Nudrat B
AU - Ghaffar, Arshad
AU - Nafziger, James AR
AU - Nalule, Victoria R.
AU - Paterson, Robert Kirkwood
AU - Peterson, Robert L.
AU - Dinopoulos, Alexander Carl
AU - Polymenopoulou, Eleni
AU - Alegre, Elvira Prado
AU - Carril, Beatriz Barreiro
AU - Coracini, Astrid Reisinger
AU - Renold, Marc-André
AU - Chechi, Alessandro
AU - Renteln, Alison Dundes
AU - Saliba, Aziz Tuffi
AU - Fabris, Alice Lopes
AU - Dávila, Jorge Sánchez Cordero
AU - Schreiber, Hanna
AU - Ubertazzi, Benedetta
AU - Wyk, Louis J van
AU - Schorlemer, Sabine Irene Freifrau von
AU - Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa
AU - Huang, Jie
PY - 2022/11/7
Y1 - 2022/11/7
N2 - This Committee, established in 2017, started its work at the ILA’s Seventy-Eighth Conference in Sydney.1 The Committee’s mandate addresses the pressing challenge in the field of international heritage law stemming from its sectoral fragmentation and specialization. Indeed, international cultural heritage law suffers from a problem of operating as a series of almost ‘self-contained’ regimes, without meaningful engagement with other instruments in this domain, not to mention nonheritage instruments. Part of this isolation stems from the lack of engagement of actors other than states and heritage domain-specific experts. The Committee’s focus on participation therefore serves to address broader issues of heritage governance, just seen through the lenses of the conceptualization and implementation of participation.
AB - This Committee, established in 2017, started its work at the ILA’s Seventy-Eighth Conference in Sydney.1 The Committee’s mandate addresses the pressing challenge in the field of international heritage law stemming from its sectoral fragmentation and specialization. Indeed, international cultural heritage law suffers from a problem of operating as a series of almost ‘self-contained’ regimes, without meaningful engagement with other instruments in this domain, not to mention nonheritage instruments. Part of this isolation stems from the lack of engagement of actors other than states and heritage domain-specific experts. The Committee’s focus on participation therefore serves to address broader issues of heritage governance, just seen through the lenses of the conceptualization and implementation of participation.
U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.4220401
DO - 10.2139/ssrn.4220401
M3 - Commissioned report
BT - International Law Association Committee on Participation in Global Cultural Heritage Governance
PB - International Law Association
ER -