Impact of membrane-electrode assembly fabrication technique on PEM fuel cell performance

V. Mittal*, R. Zaffou, H. R. Kunz, J. M. Fenton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

PEM fuel cell performance is limited by three main sources of polarization losses: activation, ohmic and mass transport. Relative magnitudes of these differ depending upon the type of catalyst, membrane and substrate used in the fuel cell. More importantly there can also be a large variation in these losses between cells having the same components, due to the different fabrication techniques used in making the Membrane-Electrode Assembly (MEA). Even for a particular technique like screen-printing, the processing conditions alter the performance due to the different polarization losses (1). These differences become more significant at higher operating cell temperature and lower relative humidity operation. Catalyst coated membranes (CCMs) were made for a PEM fuel cell using screen-printing or the decal transfer method. Fuel cell performance was compared between cells made under different processing conditions. Effects of catalyst drying temperature, amount of propylene glycol in the catalyst ink and membrane used were studied on fuel cell performance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProton Conducting Membrane Fuel Cells IV - Proceedings of the International Symposium
Pages711-722
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes
Event206th Meeting of The Electrochemical Society Fall 2004 - Honolulu, HI, United States
Duration: 3 Oct 20068 Oct 2006

Publication series

NameProceedings - Electrochemical Society
VolumePV 2004-21

Conference

Conference206th Meeting of The Electrochemical Society Fall 2004
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityHonolulu, HI
Period3/10/068/10/06

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of membrane-electrode assembly fabrication technique on PEM fuel cell performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this