TY - GEN
T1 - Impact of membrane-electrode assembly fabrication technique on PEM fuel cell performance
AU - Mittal, V.
AU - Zaffou, R.
AU - Kunz, H. R.
AU - Fenton, J. M.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - PEM fuel cell performance is limited by three main sources of polarization losses: activation, ohmic and mass transport. Relative magnitudes of these differ depending upon the type of catalyst, membrane and substrate used in the fuel cell. More importantly there can also be a large variation in these losses between cells having the same components, due to the different fabrication techniques used in making the Membrane-Electrode Assembly (MEA). Even for a particular technique like screen-printing, the processing conditions alter the performance due to the different polarization losses (1). These differences become more significant at higher operating cell temperature and lower relative humidity operation. Catalyst coated membranes (CCMs) were made for a PEM fuel cell using screen-printing or the decal transfer method. Fuel cell performance was compared between cells made under different processing conditions. Effects of catalyst drying temperature, amount of propylene glycol in the catalyst ink and membrane used were studied on fuel cell performance.
AB - PEM fuel cell performance is limited by three main sources of polarization losses: activation, ohmic and mass transport. Relative magnitudes of these differ depending upon the type of catalyst, membrane and substrate used in the fuel cell. More importantly there can also be a large variation in these losses between cells having the same components, due to the different fabrication techniques used in making the Membrane-Electrode Assembly (MEA). Even for a particular technique like screen-printing, the processing conditions alter the performance due to the different polarization losses (1). These differences become more significant at higher operating cell temperature and lower relative humidity operation. Catalyst coated membranes (CCMs) were made for a PEM fuel cell using screen-printing or the decal transfer method. Fuel cell performance was compared between cells made under different processing conditions. Effects of catalyst drying temperature, amount of propylene glycol in the catalyst ink and membrane used were studied on fuel cell performance.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33751260305
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33751260305
SN - 1566774349
SN - 9781566774345
T3 - Proceedings - Electrochemical Society
SP - 711
EP - 722
BT - Proton Conducting Membrane Fuel Cells IV - Proceedings of the International Symposium
T2 - 206th Meeting of The Electrochemical Society Fall 2004
Y2 - 3 October 2006 through 8 October 2006
ER -