TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental Impacts and Adsorption Isotherms of Coconut Shell Activated Carbon
T2 - Effect of Acid Activation, Water, and Fuel
AU - Saleem, Junaid
AU - Moghal, Zubair Khalid Baig
AU - Tahir, Furqan
AU - Al-Ansari, Tareq
AU - McKay, Gordon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/3/10
Y1 - 2025/3/10
N2 - Activated biomass has gained interest as an alternative to coal-based activated carbon (AC). This work investigates the environmental impact (EI) of coconut shell (CS)-derived AC as a substitute for non-renewable coal-based AC. The AC was produced in-house using tandem acid activation and pyrolysis, employing two activation pathways: sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and phosphoric acid (H3PO4). This study further investigates the impact of activation routes, fuel types, and water sources on environmental outcomes. This evaluation focuses on six key impacts: climate change, fossil depletion, freshwater ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, land use, and energy net. The H2SO4 activation pathway is more favorable in terms of EI due to its lower net energy requirement (27.2 MJ) and reduced carbon emissions (1.2 kg CO2 eq.). However, it requires 4.7 kg of AC to adsorb 1 kg of dye, whereas the H3PO4 pathway requires only 4.3 kg. Therefore, while the H3PO4 pathway may be preferred for applications needing higher adsorption capacities, the H2SO4 pathway offers a more environmentally benign option, highlighting the trade-offs in selecting an activation method for AC production. Additionally, this study highlights that CS-derived AC offers substantial energy savings of 78%, alongside a 75% reduction in carbon emissions and an 80% decrease in fossil depletion compared to coal-based AC. Overall, the synthesized AC shows promise as a sustainable alternative to coal-based counterparts.
AB - Activated biomass has gained interest as an alternative to coal-based activated carbon (AC). This work investigates the environmental impact (EI) of coconut shell (CS)-derived AC as a substitute for non-renewable coal-based AC. The AC was produced in-house using tandem acid activation and pyrolysis, employing two activation pathways: sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and phosphoric acid (H3PO4). This study further investigates the impact of activation routes, fuel types, and water sources on environmental outcomes. This evaluation focuses on six key impacts: climate change, fossil depletion, freshwater ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, land use, and energy net. The H2SO4 activation pathway is more favorable in terms of EI due to its lower net energy requirement (27.2 MJ) and reduced carbon emissions (1.2 kg CO2 eq.). However, it requires 4.7 kg of AC to adsorb 1 kg of dye, whereas the H3PO4 pathway requires only 4.3 kg. Therefore, while the H3PO4 pathway may be preferred for applications needing higher adsorption capacities, the H2SO4 pathway offers a more environmentally benign option, highlighting the trade-offs in selecting an activation method for AC production. Additionally, this study highlights that CS-derived AC offers substantial energy savings of 78%, alongside a 75% reduction in carbon emissions and an 80% decrease in fossil depletion compared to coal-based AC. Overall, the synthesized AC shows promise as a sustainable alternative to coal-based counterparts.
KW - activated carbon
KW - life cycle assessment
KW - source of fuel
KW - source of water
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105001174951
U2 - 10.3390/c11010022
DO - 10.3390/c11010022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105001174951
SN - 2311-5629
VL - 11
JO - C-Journal of Carbon Research
JF - C-Journal of Carbon Research
IS - 1
M1 - 22
ER -