Editorial: (10 years) Water-Energy-Food nexus: Towards knowledge synthesis, action prioritization and revitalization of security debates

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Water-Energy-Food nexus (WEF nexus) has emerged as a colossal environmental debate on how to improve the sustainability and resilience of resource systems. This debate has been inclusive of different disciplines and methodological approaches that have improved our understanding of the tight interconnectedness between the resource systems, and have highlighted the need for great coordination across the respective sectors. Following a decade of growing global attention toward WEF nexus-related challenges and opportunities, particularly after the Bonn Conference and World Economic Forum in 2011, the resulting body of academic literature has coined an area of study that mainly relies on decision support tools, models, simulations, stakeholder engagement, and policy analyses for guiding integrative resource planning, governance and policy-making across the WEF sectors. However, 10 years is a short period in the lifespan of a useful paradigm for sustainability, resource security or integrated management-as the WEF nexus is often understood to be. One can expect the WEF nexus to continue motivating a fruitful knowledge production, resulting in innovative perspectives that will arguably have wider implications for our understanding of resource security as well as the global sustainability agenda.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1125534
Number of pages3
JournalFrontiers in Water
Volume4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Water-Energy-Food nexus
  • Environmental policy
  • Regional studies
  • Resource security
  • Sustainability agenda
  • Sustainable development
  • Water
  • Environmental aspects of FCs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial: (10 years) Water-Energy-Food nexus: Towards knowledge synthesis, action prioritization and revitalization of security debates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this