Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Competing programs shape cortical sensorimotor–association axis development

  • Jeremiah Tsyporin
  • , Menglei Zhang
  • , Cai Qi
  • , Ashlea Segal
  • , Xinyun Li
  • , Hyojin Kim
  • , Sang Hun Choi
  • , Ivan Pavlovic
  • , Sara Bandiera
  • , Thomas Finn
  • , Suel Kee Kim
  • , Akemi Shibata
  • , Takumi Nakamura
  • , Kohei Onishi
  • , Ziqin Zhang
  • , Elijah Hammarlund
  • , Graham Su
  • , Nikkita Salla
  • , Joy Kachko
  • , Christi Hawley
  • Shuiyu Li, Daniel Z. Doyle, Xueyan Peng, Timothy Nottoli, Nuria Ruiz-Reig, Fadel Tissir, Yasushi Nakagawa, Erica Herzog, Shaojie Ma, Kevin Gobeske, Kartik Pattabiraman, Tomomi Shimogori, Alvaro Duque, Alex Fornito, Hao Huang, Mikihito Shibata, Bin Chen, Nenad Sestan*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Yale University
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • RIKEN
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology
  • Monash University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The cerebral cortex is organized along a dominant sensorimotor-to-association (S–A) axis, anchored by modality-specific primary sensorimotor areas at one end and transmodal association areas forming distributed networks that support abstract cognition at the other1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10–11. The developmental mechanisms shaping this axis remain unclear9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23–24. Here we present converging multispecies evidence supporting the multinodal induction–exclusion in network development (MIND) model, in which S–A patterning is governed by competing processes of induction and exclusion driven by two opposing transcriptomically defined programs. ‘Pericentral’ programs are induced around the frontotemporal poles, progress inwards toward the central regions of the undifferentiated neocortex and define higher-order association features. ‘Central’ programs are induced centrally through first-order sensorimotor thalamocortical inputs, establish primary areas and exclude pericentral programs. These conserved programs compete for space, resulting in compartmentalized expression of axon guidance, cell–cell adhesion, retinoic acid signalling, synaptogenesis, WNT signalling and autism-risk-associated genes. Notably, PLXNC1 and SEMA7A, a receptor–ligand pair representing pericentral and central programs, respectively, exhibit repulsive interactions between primary and higher-order association corticocortical axons. Induction and exclusion together establish an S–A organization in which primary areas emerge as focal islands within a broader ocean of distributed association networks. The MIND model provides a unifying framework for experimental, evolutionary and clinical phenomena, revealing induction and exclusion as antagonistic yet complementary principles shaping the S–A axis and processing hierarchies.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages56
JournalNature
Early online dateJul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - Jul 2026

Keywords

  • Brain-development
  • Cell-division
  • Cerebral-cortex
  • Gene-expression
  • Human-fetal
  • Prenatal development
  • Rhesus-monkey
  • Rna-seq
  • Subcortical projection neurons
  • Visual-cortex

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competing programs shape cortical sensorimotor–association axis development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this