Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o2max

Li Zuo; Tingyang Zhou; Davide Malatesta; Stefano Lanzi; Grégoire P. Millet; S. Pogliaghi; D. H. Paterson; J. M. Murias; Stephan van der Zwaard; Richard T. Jaspers; Willem J. van der Laarse

doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max

Li Zuo
, Tingyang Zhou
, Davide Malatesta
, Stefano Lanzi
, Grégoire P. Millet
, S. Pogliaghi
, D. H. Paterson
, J. M. Murias
, Stephan van der Zwaard
, Richard T. Jaspers
, Willem J. van der Laarse

Ohio State University
University of Lausanne
University of Verona
Western University
University of Calgary
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
VU University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	966-967
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume	125
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2018
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

Cite this

Zuo, L., Zhou, T., Malatesta, D., Lanzi, S., Millet, G. P., Pogliaghi, S., Paterson, D. H., Murias, J. M., van der Zwaard, S., Jaspers, R. T., & van der Laarse, W. J. (2018). Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max. Journal of Applied Physiology, 125(3), 966-967. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

@article{22eaaf22e84e4c70895b59bf65993c6f,

title = "Commentaries on Viewpoint: {\.V}o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not {\.V}o2max",

author = "Li Zuo and Tingyang Zhou and Davide Malatesta and Stefano Lanzi and Millet, \{Gr{\'e}goire P.\} and S. Pogliaghi and Paterson, \{D. H.\} and Murias, \{J. M.\} and \{van der Zwaard\}, Stephan and Jaspers, \{Richard T.\} and \{van der Laarse\}, \{Willem J.\}",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018",

language = "English",

volume = "125",

pages = "966--967",

journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",

issn = "8750-7587",

publisher = "American Physiological Society",

number = "3",

}

Zuo, L, Zhou, T, Malatesta, D, Lanzi, S, Millet, GP, Pogliaghi, S, Paterson, DH, Murias, JM, van der Zwaard, S, Jaspers, RT & van der Laarse, WJ 2018, 'Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max', Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 966-967. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentaries on Viewpoint

T2 - V̇o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o2max

AU - Zuo, Li

AU - Zhou, Tingyang

AU - Malatesta, Davide

AU - Lanzi, Stefano

AU - Millet, Grégoire P.

AU - Pogliaghi, S.

AU - Paterson, D. H.

AU - Murias, J. M.

AU - van der Zwaard, Stephan

AU - Jaspers, Richard T.

AU - van der Laarse, Willem J.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85072710706

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30260762

AN - SCOPUS:85072710706

SN - 8750-7587

VL - 125

SP - 966

EP - 967

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

IS - 3

ER -

Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o2max

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this

Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o_2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o_2max