Coalition formation and cost allocation for joint replenishment systems

  • Adel Elomri*
  • , Asma Ghaffari
  • , Zied Jemai
  • , Yves Dallery
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the issues of coalition formation and cost allocation in a joint replenishment system involving a set of independent and freely interacting retailers purchasing an item from one supplier to meet a deterministic demand. The papers dealing with this problem are mainly focused on supperadditive games, where the cost savings associated with a coalition increase with the number of players in the coalition. The most relevant question addressed then is how to allocate the savings to the players. In this paper, we propose to go further by dealing with a non-supperadditive game, where a set of independent retailers have the common understanding to share the cost savings according to the cost-based proportional rule. In this setting, the global cost optimization is no longer a relevant approach to identify appealing coalitions for any retailer. Here, we provide an iterative procedure to form the so-called efficient coalition structure and we show that this coalition structure has the nice properties of being (i) weakly stable in the sense of the coalition structure core and (ii) strongly stable under a given assumption. An exact fractional programming based solution is also given to generate such efficient coalitions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1015-1027
Number of pages13
JournalProduction and Operations Management
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • coalition formation
  • coalition structure core
  • cooperative game theory
  • fractional programming
  • joint replenishment
  • proportional allocations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coalition formation and cost allocation for joint replenishment systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this