Abstract
This letter quantitatively evaluates two alternative approaches to the scheduling of traffic streams in a high-speed ATM switch with multiple input queues. Specifically, we compare a previously proposed algorithm, called it parallel iterative matching (PIM) - which is a cell-based scheduling algorithm - with our newly proposed algorithm - which is a burst-based variation of the PIM scheduling algorithm. Extensive simulation results will demonstrate that burst-based PIM scheduling outperforms cell-based PIM scheduling under a variety of realistic parameters.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 202-204 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | IEEE Communications Letters |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2000 |
| Externally published | Yes |