TY - CHAP
T1 - Appraising the Institutional Framework of the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act)
AU - Malik, Abeer
AU - Solaiman, Barry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This chapter critiques the institutional framework of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), the first comprehensive law to regulate AI globally. While the Act adopts a product safety model to leverage existing EU regulatory structures, it risks inheriting their limitations, raising questions about its ability to address AI’s unique challenges. The analysis identifies several concerns, including overlapping roles and unclear mandates among key institutions, such as the European Commission and the newly established AI Office. These inefficiencies are compounded by the Act’s integration into a broader, complex web of EU regulations, such as data and sector-specific laws, creating enforcement ambiguities and potential gaps in oversight. The chapter concludes by recommending clearer institutional delineations, streamlined governance mechanisms, and targeted reforms to align regulatory structures with the Act’s goals. By addressing these issues, the EU can strengthen its capacity to ensure effective AI governance.
AB - This chapter critiques the institutional framework of the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), the first comprehensive law to regulate AI globally. While the Act adopts a product safety model to leverage existing EU regulatory structures, it risks inheriting their limitations, raising questions about its ability to address AI’s unique challenges. The analysis identifies several concerns, including overlapping roles and unclear mandates among key institutions, such as the European Commission and the newly established AI Office. These inefficiencies are compounded by the Act’s integration into a broader, complex web of EU regulations, such as data and sector-specific laws, creating enforcement ambiguities and potential gaps in oversight. The chapter concludes by recommending clearer institutional delineations, streamlined governance mechanisms, and targeted reforms to align regulatory structures with the Act’s goals. By addressing these issues, the EU can strengthen its capacity to ensure effective AI governance.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020470680
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-98406-8_5
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-98406-8_5
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:105020470680
T3 - Law, Governance and Technology Series
SP - 105
EP - 129
BT - Law, Governance and Technology Series
PB - Springer Nature
ER -