Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Access to Justice in Tennis Disputes

  • Georgetown University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter explains the various mechanisms for the resolution of disputes, chiefly arising out of violations of the rules of the ITF, ATP and WTA. It focuses on ITF mechanisms, starting with internal processes and on-site quasi adjudicatory mechanisms. It then goes on to examine the ITF’s Internal Adjudication Panel, especially its first-instance, appellate and supervisory function, followed by the Independent Tribunal, which is an arbitral body. It proceeds to look at the various types of powers and functions conferred on the Tribunal and the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) arising out of appeals against the Independent Tribunal. The chapter examines briefly the very narrow ATP and WTA dispute resolution mechanisms and the role of national courts in dealing with contractual tennis disputes.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProfessional Tennis and Transnational Law
Subtitle of host publicationContractual and Regulatory
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages147-169
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9781009597654
ISBN (Print)9781009597616
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
  • adjudication
  • appeals
  • arbitration
  • courts
  • jurisdiction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Access to Justice in Tennis Disputes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this