Abstract
This chapter explains the various mechanisms for the resolution of disputes, chiefly arising out of violations of the rules of the ITF, ATP and WTA. It focuses on ITF mechanisms, starting with internal processes and on-site quasi adjudicatory mechanisms. It then goes on to examine the ITF’s Internal Adjudication Panel, especially its first-instance, appellate and supervisory function, followed by the Independent Tribunal, which is an arbitral body. It proceeds to look at the various types of powers and functions conferred on the Tribunal and the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) arising out of appeals against the Independent Tribunal. The chapter examines briefly the very narrow ATP and WTA dispute resolution mechanisms and the role of national courts in dealing with contractual tennis disputes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Professional Tennis and Transnational Law |
| Subtitle of host publication | Contractual and Regulatory |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 147-169 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009597654 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781009597616 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2025 |
Keywords
- Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)
- adjudication
- appeals
- arbitration
- courts
- jurisdiction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Access to Justice in Tennis Disputes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver